Wrong scale, but the next Project Layout in Model Railroader, beginning with the January 2024 issue is a FreeMo module... in Horribly Oversized as we call 1:87 proportion around here. The construction of a single module begs the question, well, how do you operate it, and the answer is not restricted to any scale: detachable tail tracks. Something to think about if you've only got room for one at home.
Big Jake, I am agreed on all 3 of your earlier points. To which, I would add... Strike 4: FreeMoN layout height is still too short. In my experience, track height of about 53" offers a much more presentable view of N scale. But then, I'm a taller person. I understand, it's a compromise. However, I think we can do better as N scalers. The concept has great potential. But often, FreeMoN still seems to fall short of what it can be. I'm always bummed out, as an N-scaler myself, to see the usual N scale stereotypes of disjointed scenery, the circus & the all beer reefer trains, and unballasted track on FreeMoN setups. Sorry, but I have more realism as my goal. I am very biased, I admit. When I display my sectional layouts at shows, I'm always amused by the blank looks I get after the following exchange: "Who's (modular layout) standards are you using?" "My own." I'm not saying these organizations are bad. They are a great place to start. I'm just trying to save you a few steps in the process. Consider spending some time observing the great model train universe. Collect methods and techniques you like. Consider venturing out on your own. Its very rewarding.
Therefore, and my point, don't feel you have to use anyone's standards. Feel free to strike out on your own
You've made an important point here that I think is frequently missed: There's a difference between "Modular" and "Sectional." Modular (to me, anyway) implies standards that enable connection of pieces together including those built by people who are perhaps as far as away as the other side of the country, if not the world. ("Galaxy" not included.) Sectional (again, to me, anyway) implies that the layout in question can be separated into pieces for transportation and setup "elsewhere"-- be it another temporary location or another residence. Chances are that those sections can be put together in only one way, and isn't meant to align with other people's sections. The first major iteration of the Wilmington and New York, my home layout, was built in sections, and was transported from my then-apartment to my first house.
Good point. Some modules are sectional, too, so they can be broken down for transport, but when assembled together, the external interfaces comply with the modular standard, so as to integrate into a layout of modules by different makers.
https://www.google.com/search?q=sec...MSBAiAYBkAYIugYGCAEQARgT&sclient=gws-wiz-serp ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................................https://www.google.com/search?q=Mod...AIEGIBgGQBgi6BgYIARABGBM&sclient=gws-wiz-serp
